Special fields of psychology
Special fields of psychology
SPECIAL FIELDS OF PSYCHOLOGY
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Physiological psychology
3. Psychoanalysis
4. Behaviourism
5. Gestalt psychology
6 .Cognition
7. Tests and Measurements
8. Development psychology
9. Social psychology
10. Psychiatry and mental health
11. Forensic psychology and criminology
12. Psychology, religion and phenomenology
13. Parapsychology
14. Industrial Psychology
Vocabulary
Literature
1. Introduction
Psychology, scientific study of behavior and experience—that is, the
study of how human beings and animals sense, think, learn, and know.
Modern psychology is devoted to collecting facts about behavior and
experience and systematically organizing such facts into psychological
theories. These theories aid in understanding and explaining people’s
behavior and sometimes in predicting and influencing their future
behavior.
Psychology, historically, has been divided into many subfields of
study; these fields, however, are interrelated and frequently overlap.
Physiological psychologists, for instance, study the functioning of the
brain and the nervous system, and experimental psychologists devise
tests and conduct research to discover how people learn and remember.
Subfields of psychology may also be described in terms of areas of
application. Social psychologists, for example, are interested in the
ways in which people influence one another and the way they act in
groups. Industrial psychologists study the behavior of people at work
and the effects of the work environment. School psychologists help
students make educational and career decisions. Clinical psychologists
assist those who have problems in daily life or who are mentally ill.
History. The science of psychology developed from many diverse sources,
but its origins as a science may be traced to ancient Greece.
Philosophical Beginnings. Plato and Aristotle, as well as other Greek
philosophers, took up some of the basic questions of psychology that
are still under study: Are people born with certain skills, abilities,
and personality, or do all these develop as a result of experience? How
do people come to know the world? Are certain ideas and feelings
innate, or are they all learned?
Such questions were debated for many centuries, but the roots of modern
psychological theory are found in the 17th century in the works of the
French philosopher Ren Descartes and the British philosophers Thomas
Hobbes and John Locke. Descartes argued that the bodies of people are
like clockwork machines, but that their minds (or souls) are separate
and unique. He maintained that minds have certain inborn, or innate,
ideas and that these ideas are crucial in organizing people’s
experiencing of the world. Hobbes and Locke, on the other hand,
stressed the role of experience as the source of human knowledge. Locke
believed that all information about the physical world comes through
the senses and that all correct ideas can be traced to the sensory
information on which they are based.
Most modern psychology developed along the lines of Locke’s view. Some
European psychologists who studied perception, however, held onto
Descartes’s idea that some mental organization is innate, and the
concept still plays a role in theories of perception and cognition.
Against this philosophical background, the field that contributed most
to the development of scientific psychology was physiology—the study of
the functions of the various organ systems of the body. The German
physiologist Johannes Miller tried to relate sensory experience both to
events in the nervous system and to events in the organism’s physical
environment. The first true experimental psychologists were the German
physicist Gustav Theodor Fechner and the German physiologist Wilhelm
Wundt. Fechner developed experimental methods for measuring sensations
in terms of the physical magnitude of the stimuli producing them.
Wundt, who in 1879 founded the first laboratory of experimental
psychology in Leipzig, Germany, trained students from around the world
in this new science.
Physicians who became concerned with mental illness also contributed to
the development of modern psychological theories. Thus, the systematic
classification of mental disorders developed by the German psychiatric
pioneer Emil Kraepelin remains the basis for methods of classification
that are now in use. Far better known, however, is the work of Sigmund
Freud, who devised the system of investigation and treatment known as
psychoanalysis. In his work, Freud called attention to instinctual
drives and unconscious motivational processes that determine people’s
behavior. This stress on the contents of thought, on the dynamics of
motivation rather than the nature of cognition in itself, exerted a
strong influence on the course of modern psychology.
Modern psychology still retains many aspects of the fields and kinds of
speculation from which it grew. Some psychologists, for example, are
primarily interested in physiological research, others are medically
oriented, and a few try to develop a more encompassing, philosophical
understanding of psychology as a whole. Although some practitioners
still insist that psychology should be concerned only with behavior—and
may even deny the meaningfulness of an inner, mental life—more and more
psychologists would now agree that mental life or experience is a valid
psychological concern.
The areas of modern psychology range from the biological sciences to the
social sciences.
2. Physiological psychology
The study of underlying physiological bases of psychological functions
is known as physiological psychology. The two major communication
systems of the body—the nervous system and the circulatory system—are
the focus of most research in this area.
The nervous system consists of the central nervous system (the brain
and the spinal cord) and its outlying neural network, the peripheral
nervous system; the latter communicates with the glands and muscles and
includes the sensory receptors for seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting,
touching, feeling pain, and sensing stimuli within the body. The
circulatory system circulates the blood and also carries the important
chemical agents known as hormones from the glands to all parts of the
body. Both these communication systems are very important in overall
human behavior.
The smallest unit of the nervous system is the single nerve cell, or
neuron. When a neuron is properly stimulated, it transmits
electrochemical signals from one place in the system to another. The
nervous system has 12.5 billion neurons, of which about 10 billion are
in the brain itself.
One part of the peripheral nervous system, the somatic system,
transmits sensations into the central nervous system and carries
commands from the central system to the muscles involved in movement.
Another part of the peripheral nervous system, the autonomic system,
consists of two divisions that have opposing functions. The sympathetic
division arouses the body by speeding the heartbeat, dilating the
pupils of the eye, and releasing adrenaline into the blood. The
parasympathetic division operates to calm the body by reversing these
processes.
A simple example of communication within the nervous system is the
spinal arc, which is seen in the knee-jerk reflex. A tap on the
patellar tendon, just below the kneecap, sends a signal to the spinal
cord via sensory neurons. This signal activates motor neurons that
trigger a contraction of the muscle attached to the tendon; the
contraction, in turn, causes the leg to jerk. Thus, a stimulus can lead
to a response without involving the brain, via a connection through the
spinal cord.
Circulatory communication is ordinarily slower than nervous-system
communication. The hormones secreted by the body’s endocrine glands
circulate through the body, influencing both structural and behavioral
changes . The sex hormones, for example, that are released during
adolescence effect many changes in body growth and development as well
as changes in behavior, such as the emergence of specific sexual
activity and the increase of interest in the opposite sex. Other
hormones may have more direct, short-term effects; for instance,
adrenaline, which is secreted when a person faces an emergency,
prepares the body for a quick response—whether fighting or flight.
3. Psychoanalysis
Psychoanalysis, name applied to a specific method of investigating
unconscious mental processes and to a form of psychotherapy. The term
refers, as well, to the systematic structure of psychoanalytic theory,
which is based on the relation of conscious and unconscious
psychological processes.
Theory of Psychoanalysis
The technique of psychoanalysis and much of the psychoanalytic theory based
on its application were developed by Sigmund Freud. His work concerning the
structure and the functioning of the human mind had far-reaching
significance, both practically and scientifically, and it continues to
influence contemporary thought.
The Unconscious
The first of Freud’s innovations was his recognition of unconscious
psychiatric processes that follow laws different from those that govern
conscious experience. Under the influence of the unconscious, thoughts and
feelings that belong together may be shifted or displaced out of context;
two disparate ideas or images may be condensed into one; thoughts may be
dramatized in the form of images rather than expressed as abstract
concepts; and certain objects may be represented symbolically by images of
other objects, although the resemblance between the symbol and the original
object may be vague or farfetched. The laws of logic, indispensable for
conscious thinking, do not apply to these unconscious mental productions.
Recognition of these modes of operation in unconscious mental processes
made possible the understanding of such previously incomprehensible
psychological phenomena as dreaming. Through analysis of unconscious
processes, Freud saw dreams as serving to protect sleep against disturbing
impulses arising from within and related to early life experiences. Thus,
unacceptable impulses and thoughts, called the latent dream content, are
transformed into a conscious, although no longer immediately
comprehensible, experience called the manifest dream. Knowledge of these
unconscious mechanisms permits the analyst to reverse the so-called dream
work, that is, the process by which the latent dream is transformed into
the manifest dream, and through dream interpretation, to recognize its
underlying meaning.
Instinctual Drives
A basic assumption of Freudian theory is that the unconscious conflicts
involve instinctual impulses, or drives, that originate in childhood. As
these unconscious conflicts are recognized by the patient through analysis,
his or her adult mind can find solutions that were unattainable to the
immature mind of the child. This depiction of the role of instinctual
drives in human life is a unique feature of Freudian theory.
According to Freud’s doctrine of infantile sexuality, adult sexuality is an
end product of a complex process of development, beginning in childhood,
involving a variety of body functions or areas (oral, anal, and genital
zones), and corresponding to various stages in the relation of the child to
adults, especially to parents. Of crucial importance is the so-called
Oedipal period, occurring at about four to six years of age, because at
this stage of development the child for the first time becomes capable of
an emotional attachment to the parent of the opposite sex that is similar
to the adult’s relationship to a mate; the child simultaneously reacts as a
rival to the parent of the same sex. Physical immaturity dooms the child’s
desires to frustration and his or her first step toward adulthood to
failure. Intellectual immaturity further complicates the situation because
it makes children afraid of their own fantasies. The extent to which the
child overcomes these emotional upheavals and to which these attachments,
fears, and fantasies continue to live on in the unconscious greatly
influences later life, especially love relationships.
The conflicts occurring in the earlier developmental stages are no less
significant as a formative influence, because these problems represent the
earliest prototypes of such basic human situations as dependency on others
and relationship to authority. Also basic in molding the personality of the
individual is the behavior of the parents toward the child during these
stages of development. The fact that the child reacts, not only to
objective reality, but also to fantasy distortions of reality, however,
greatly complicates even the best-intentioned educational efforts.
Id, Ego, and Superego
The effort to clarify the bewildering number of interrelated observations
uncovered by psychoanalytic exploration led to the development of a model
of the structure of the psychic system. Three functional systems are
distinguished that are conveniently designated as the id, ego, and
superego.
The first system refers to the sexual and aggressive tendencies that arise
from the body, as distinguished from the mind. Freud called these
tendencies Triebe, which literally means “drives,” but which is often
inaccurately translated as “instincts” to indicate their innate character.
These inherent drives claim immediate satisfaction, which is experienced as
pleasurable; the id thus is dominated by the pleasure principle. In his
later writings, Freud tended more toward psychological rather than
biological conceptualization of the drives.
How the conditions for satisfaction are to be brought about is the task of
the second system, the ego, which is the domain of such functions as
perception, thinking, and motor control that can accurately assess
environmental conditions. In order to fulfill its function of adaptation,
or reality testing, the ego must be capable of enforcing the postponement
of satisfaction of the instinctual impulses originating in the id. To
defend itself against unacceptable impulses, the ego develops specific
psychic means, known as defense mechanisms. These include repression, the
exclusion of impulses from conscious awareness; projection, the process of
ascribing to others one’s own unacknowledged desires; and reaction
formation, the establishment of a pattern of behavior directly opposed to a
strong unconscious need. Such defense mechanisms are put into operation
whenever anxiety signals a danger that the original unacceptable impulses
may reemerge.
An id impulse becomes unacceptable, not only as a result of a temporary
need for postponing its satisfaction until suitable reality conditions can
be found, but more often because of a prohibition imposed on the individual
by others, originally the parents. The totality of these demands and
prohibitions constitutes the major content of the third system, the
superego, the function of which is to control the ego in accordance with
the internalized standards of parental figures. If the demands of the
superego are not fulfilled, the person may feel shame or guilt. Because the
superego, in Freudian theory, originates in the struggle to overcome the
Oedipal conflict, it has a power akin to an instinctual drive, is in part
unconscious, and can give rise to feelings of guilt not justified by any
conscious transgression. The ego, having to mediate among the demands of
the id, the superego, and the outside world, may not be strong enough to
reconcile these conflicting forces. The more the ego is impeded in its
development because of being enmeshed in its earlier conflicts, called
fixations or complexes, or the more it reverts to earlier satisfactions and
archaic modes of functioning, known as regression, the greater is the
likelihood of succumbing to these pressures. Unable to function normally,
it can maintain its limited control and integrity only at the price of
symptom formation, in which the tensions are expressed in neurotic
symptoms.
Anxiety
A cornerstone of modern psychoanalytic theory and practice is the concept
of anxiety, which institutes appropriate mechanisms of defense against
certain danger situations. These danger situations, as described by Freud,
are the fear of abandonment by or the loss of the loved one (the object),
the risk of losing the object’s love, the danger of retaliation and
punishment, and, finally, the hazard of reproach by the superego. Thus,
symptom formation, character and impulse disorders, and perversions, as
well as sublimations, represent compromise formations—different forms of an
adaptive integration that the ego tries to achieve through more or less
successfully reconciling the different conflicting forces in the mind.
Psychoanalytic Schools
Various psychoanalytic schools have adopted other names for their doctrines
to indicate deviations from Freudian theory.
Carl Jung
Carl Gustav Jung, one of the earliest pupils of Freud, eventually created a
school that he preferred to call analytical psychology. Like Freud, Jung
used the concept of the libido; however, to him it meant not only sexual
drives, but a composite of all creative instincts and impulses and the
entire motivating force of human conduct. According to his theories, the
unconscious is composed of two parts; the personal unconscious, which
contains the results of the individual’s entire experience, and the
collective unconscious, the reservoir of the experience of the human race.
In the collective unconscious exist a number of primordial images, or
archetypes, common to all individuals of a given country or historical era.
Archetypes take the form of bits of intuitive knowledge or apprehension and
normally exist only in the collective unconscious of the individual. When
the conscious mind contains no images, however, as in sleep, or when the
consciousness is caught off guard, the archetypes commence to function.
Archetypes are primitive modes of thought and tend to personify natural
processes in terms of such mythological concepts as good and evil spirits,
fairies, and dragons. The mother and the father also serve as prominent
archetypes.
An important concept in Jung’s theory is the existence of two basically
different types of personality, mental attitude, and function. When the
libido and the individual’s general interest are turned outward toward
people and objects of the external world, he or she is said to be
extroverted. When the reverse is true, and libido and interest are centered
on the individual, he or she is said to be introverted. In a completely
normal individual these two tendencies alternate, neither dominating, but
usually the libido is directed mainly in one direction or the other; as a
result, two personality types are recognizable.
Jung rejected Freud’s distinction between the ego and superego and
recognized a portion of the personality, somewhat similar to the superego,
that he called the persona. The persona consists of what a person appears
to be to others, in contrast to what he or she actually is. The persona is
the role the individual chooses to play in life, the total impression he or
she wishes to make on the outside world.
Alfred Adler
Alfred Adler, another of Freud’s pupils, differed from both Freud and Jung
in stressing that the motivating force in human life is the sense of
inferiority, which begins as soon as an infant is able to comprehend the
existence of other people who are better able to care for themselves and
cope with their environment. From the moment the feeling of inferiority is
established, the child strives to overcome it. Because inferiority is
intolerable, the compensatory mechanisms set up by the mind may get out of
hand, resulting in self-centered neurotic attitudes, overcompensations, and
a retreat from the real world and its problems.
Adler laid particular stress on inferiority feelings arising from what he
regarded as the three most important relationships: those between the
individual and work, friends, and loved ones. The avoidance of inferiority
feelings in these relationships leads the individual to adopt a life goal
that is often not realistic and frequently is expressed as an unreasoning
will to power and dominance, leading to every type of antisocial behavior
from bullying and boasting to political tyranny. Adler believed that
analysis can foster a sane and rational “community feeling” that is
constructive rather than destructive.
Otto Rank
Another student of Freud, Otto Rank, introduced a new theory of neurosis,
attributing all neurotic disturbances to the primary trauma of birth. In
his later writings he described individual development as a progression
from complete dependence on the mother and family, to a physical
independence coupled with intellectual dependence on society, and finally
to complete intellectual and psychological emancipation. Rank also laid
great importance on the will, defined as “a positive guiding organization
and integration of self, which utilizes creatively as well as inhibits and
controls the instinctual drives.”
Other Psychoanalytic Schools
Later noteworthy modifications of psychoanalytic theory include those of
the American psychoanalysts Erich Fromm, Karen Horney, and Harry Stack
Sullivan. The theories of Fromm lay particular emphasis on the concept that
society and the individual are not separate and opposing forces, that the
nature of society is determined by its historic background, and that the
needs and desires of individuals are largely formed by their society. As a
result, Fromm believed, the fundamental problem of psychoanalysis and
psychology is not to resolve conflicts between fixed and unchanging
instinctive drives in the individual and the fixed demands and laws of
society, but to bring about harmony and an understanding of the
relationship between the individual and society. Fromm also stressed the
importance to the individual of developing the ability to fully use his or
her mental, emotional, and sensory powers.
Horney worked primarily in the field of therapy and the nature of neuroses,
which she defined as of two types: situation neuroses and character
neuroses. Situation neuroses arise from the anxiety attendant on a single
conflict, such as being faced with a difficult decision. Although they may
paralyze the individual temporarily, making it impossible to think or act
efficiently, such neuroses are not deeply rooted. Character neuroses are
characterized by a basic anxiety and a basic hostility resulting from a
lack of love and affection in childhood.
Sullivan believed that all development can be described exclusively in
terms of interpersonal relations. Character types as well as neurotic
symptoms are explained as results of the struggle against anxiety arising
from the individual’s relations with others and are a security system,
maintained for the purpose of allaying anxiety.
Melanie Klein
An important school of thought is based on the teachings of the British
psychoanalyst Melanie Klein. Because most of Klein’s followers worked with
her in England, this has come to be known as the English school. Its
influence, nevertheless, is very strong throughout the European continent
and in South America. Its principal theories were derived from observations
made in the psychoanalysis of children. Klein posited the existence of
complex unconscious fantasies in children under the age of six months. The
principal source of anxiety arises from the threat to existence posed by
the death instinct. Depending on how concrete representations of the
destructive forces are dealt with in the unconscious fantasy life of the
child, two basic early mental attitudes result that Klein characterized as
a “depressive position” and a “paranoid position.” In the paranoid
position, the ego’s defense consists of projecting the dangerous internal
object onto some external representative, which is treated as a genuine
threat emanating from the external world. In the depressive position, the
threatening object is introjected and treated in fantasy as concretely
retained within the person. Depressive and hypochondriacal symptoms result.
Although considerable doubt exists that such complex unconscious fantasies
operate in the minds of infants, these observations have been of the utmost
importance to the psychology of unconscious fantasies, paranoid delusions,
and theory concerning early object relations.
4. Behaviriourism
The literature of this school of psychology is still awaiting its
bibliographer. Though this interpretation of human actions and
reactions has been strongly criticized by other psychologists, the
leading figures - B.F.Skinner, J.B.Watson and E.C.Tolman - have also
been recognized and respected as great scholars. Skenner`s own summary
About behaviorism, 1974, contained numerous bibliographic references to
this important interpretation of man’s relationship to the world around
him. Strange compilation of references designed to show the errors of
this school of psychology was published by A.A.Roback in 1923 as part
of his critical discussion entitled Behaviorism and Psychology; it is
now only of historical interest.
We have already referred to Robert 1 Watson`s The history of psychology
and behavioral sciences: a bibliographic guide, 1978. in our discussion
of the general background guides to psychology. It suffices to note,
here, that this work, though by one of the leading scholars of the
behaviorist school, is not, and does not pretend to be, a bibliography
of Behaviourism. In some respects the same can be said of
C.Heidenreich`s Dictionary of personality: behavior and adjustment
terms, which appeared in 1968. Both these books have been compiled by
leading members of this behaviorist school and unquestionably
representative of the views of that school. We have mentioned these
works here for that reason, but stress that these are scholarly and
unbiased reference works which do not include or misrepresent
references to other interpretations of human behavior.
5. Gestalt psychology
Gestalt Psychology, school of psychology that deals mainly with the
processes of perception. According to Gestalt psychology, images are
perceived as a pattern or a whole rather than merely as a sum of
distinct component parts. The context of an image plays a key role. For
instance, in the context of a city silhouette the shape of a spire is
perceived as a church steeple. Gestalt psychology tries to formulate
the laws governing such perceptual processes.
Gestalt psychology began as a protest. At the beginning of the 20th
century, associationism dominated psychology. The associationist view
that stimuli are perceived as parts and then built into images excluded
as much as it sought to explain; for instance, it allowed little room
for such human concepts as meaning and value. About 1910, German
researchers Max Wertheimer, Wolfgang Köhler, and Kurt Koffka rejected
the prevailing order of scientific analysis in psychology. They did
not, however, reject science; rather they sought a scientific approach
more nearly related to the subject matter of psychology. They adopted
that of field theory, newly developed in physics. This model permitted
them to look at perception in terms other than the mechanistic atomism
of the associationists.
Gestalt psychologists found perception to be heavily influenced by the
context or configuration of the perceived elements. The word Gestalt
can be translated from the German approximately as “configuration.” The
parts often derive their nature and purpose from the whole and cannot
be understood apart from it. Moreover, a straightforward summation
process of individual elements cannot account for the whole. Activities
within the total field of the whole govern the perceptual processes.
The approach of Gestalt psychology has been extended to research in
areas as diverse as thinking, memory, and the nature of aesthetics.
Topics in social psychology have also been studied from the
structuralist Gestalt viewpoint, as in Kurt Lewin’s work on group
dynamics. It is in the area of perception, however, that Gestalt
psychology has had its greatest influence.
In addition, several contemporary psychotherapies are termed Gestalt.
These are constructed along lines similar to Gestalt psychology’s
approach to perception. Human beings respond holistically to
experience; according to Gestalt therapists, any separation of mind and
body is artificial. Accurate perception of one’s own needs and of the
world is vital in order to balance one’s experience and achieve “good
Gestalten.” Movement away from awareness breaks the holistic response,
or Gestalt. Gestalt therapists attempt to restore an individual’s
natural, harmonic balance by heightening awareness. The emphasis is on
present experience, rather than on recollections of infancy and early
childhood as in psychoanalysis. Direct confrontation with one’s fears
is encouraged.
6. Cognition psychology
Cognition, act or process of knowing. Cognition includes attention,
perception, memory, reasoning, judgment, imagining, thinking, and speech.
Attempts to explain the way in which cognition works are as old as
philosophy itself; the term, in fact, comes from the writings of Plato and
Aristotle. With the advent of psychology as a discipline separate from
philosophy, cognition has been investigated from several viewpoints.
An entire field—cognitive psychology—has arisen since the 1950s. It studies
cognition mainly from the standpoint of information handling. Parallels are
stressed between the functions of the human brain and the computer concepts
such as the coding, storing, retrieving, and buffering of information. The
actual physiology of cognition is of little interest to cognitive
psychologists, but their theoretical models of cognition have deepened
understanding of memory, psycholinguistics, and the development of
intelligence.
Social psychologists since the mid-1960s have written extensively on the
topic of cognitive consistency—that is, the tendency of a person’s beliefs
and actions to be logically consistent with one another. When cognitive
dissonance, or the lack of such consistency, arises, the person
unconsciously seeks to restore consistency by changing his or her behavior,
beliefs, or perceptions. The manner in which a particular individual
classifies cognitions in order to impose order has been termed cognitive
style.
7. Tests and Measurements
Many fields of psychology use tests and measurement devices. The best-
known psychological tool is intelligence testing. Since the early 1900s
psychologists have been measuring intelligence—or, more accurately, the
ability to succeed in schoolwork. Such tests have proved useful in
classifying students, assigning people to training programs, and
predicting success in many kinds of schooling. Special tests have been
developed to predict success in different occupations and to assess how
much knowledge people have about different kinds of specialties. In
addition, psychologists have constructed tests for measuring aspects of
personality, interests, and attitudes. Thousands of tests have been
devised for measuring different human traits.
A key problem in test construction, however, is the development of a
criterion—that is, some standard to which the test is to be related.
For intelligence tests, for example, the usual criterion has been
success in school, but intelligence tests have frequently been attacked
on the basis of cultural bias (that is, the test results may reflect a
child’s background as much as it does learning ability). For vocational-
interest tests, the standard generally has been persistence in an
occupation. One general difficulty with personality tests is the lack
of agreement among psychologists as to what standards should be used.
Many criteria have been proposed, but most are only indirectly related
to the aspect of personality that is being measured.
Very sophisticated statistical models have been developed for tests,
and a detailed technology underlies most successful testing. Many
psychologists have become adept at constructing testing devices for
special purposes and at devising measurements, once agreement is
reached as to what should be measured.
Types of Tests
Currently, a wide range of testing procedures is used in the U.S. and
elsewhere. Each type of procedure is designed to carry out specific
functions.
Achievement Tests . These tests are designed to assess current performance
in an academic area. Because achievement is viewed as an indicator of
previous learning, it is often used to predict future academic success. An
achievement test administered in a public school setting would typically
include separate measures of vocabulary, language skills and reading
comprehension, arithmetic computation and problem solving, science, and
social studies. Individual achievement is determined by comparison of
results with average scores derived from large representative national or
local samples. Scores may be expressed in terms of “grade-level
equivalents”; for example, an advanced third-grade pupil may be reading on
a level equivalent to that of the average fourth-grade student.
Aptitude Tests. These tests predict future performance in an area in which
the individual is not currently trained. Schools, businesses, and
government agencies often use aptitude tests when assigning individuals to
specific positions. Vocational guidance counseling may involve aptitude
testing to help clarify individual career goals. If a person’s score is
similar to scores of others already working in a given occupation,
likelihood of success in that field is predicted. Some aptitude tests cover
a broad range of skills pertinent to many different occupations. The
General Aptitude Test Battery, for example, not only measures general
reasoning ability but also includes form perception, clerical perception,
motor coordination, and finger and manual dexterity. Other tests may focus
on a single area, such as art, engineering, or modern languages.
Intelligence Tests. In contrast to tests of specific proficiencies or
aptitudes, intelligence tests measure the global capacity of an individual
to cope with the environment. Test scores are generally known as
intelligence quotients, or IQs, although the various tests are constructed
quite differently. The Stanford-Binet is heavily weighted with items
involving verbal abilities; the Wechsler scales consist of two separate
verbal and performance subscales, each with its own IQ. There are also
specialized infant intelligence tests, tests that do not require the use of
Ñòðàíèöû: 1, 2
|